Luther’s Antichrist Theology was the Result of biblical Analysis!



Views:415|Rating:4.72|View Time:1:3:57Minutes|Likes:17|Dislikes:1
This is part 5 of the introductory reading and discussing a paper that deals with Martin Luther’s understanding of identifying the biblical, historical and prophetic Antichrist. Martin Luther’s understanding that the papacy and ONLY the papacy fulfills this role to the letter grew as he grew in the understanding of the Word of God as do we all. It was for him a hard learning curve, considering he was raised catholic and an augustinian monk himself. So during these 5 readings which will lead us to read the book “Against the Papacy, an Institution of the Devil” we will learn how Martin Luther understood the roman catholic church to be the synagogue of Satan that it is. After this 5 readings I will read and discuss that last book Luther wrote and published in 1545, on the same day, the diabolical counterreformational council of Trent started, the 25th of march 1545. THE PROTEST IS NOT OVER, with videos like this we have to rekindle the Protestant flame worldwide in the light of the last days! Help this cause by spreading these videos as far as you can through re-uploading to your channel on You Tube or any other video platform and social media you are using (without any alteration of the content and not for commercial purposes!)
All parts can be found in this playlist:
Playlist “Against the Roman Papacy, an Institution of the Devil”:

More playlists I advise to watch:

Hour of the Truth on VIMEO:
VIMEO channel:

Playlist “Hour of the Truth”

Playlist “Against the Roman Papacy, an Institution of the Devil”:

Playlist “All Roads lead to Rome”:

Playlist “Rulers Of Evil”:

 
Playlist “Babylon Mystery Religion”:

Playlist “Behind the Dictators”:

Playlist ‘Inquisition Update’:

Playlist “Hour of the Truth meets Inquisition Update”
Ch 3:
Ch 1:

Playlist “Romanism and the Reformation”

Playlist “History of the Inquisition”:

Playlist “Nothing But the Truth”:

Who is the Biblical, Historical and Prophetic ANTICHRIST?
Playlist “Characteristics of Antichrist”

Playlist ‘The Global Vatican’ Reviewed by Tom Friess, Inquisition Update

Playlist ‘Tom Friess Reviews – Rome And Civil Liberty – Inquisition Update’

Playlist “Footprints of the Jesuits” – Tom Friess from Inquisition Update

Playlist “The Papacy and the Civil Power” by R. W. Thompson Reviewed by Tom Friess, Inquisition Update

Playlist “The Foundations under Attack- The Roots of Apostacy” by Michael De Semlyen reviewed by Tom Friess from Inquisition Update

Playlist “Martin Luther in His Own Words” Inquisition Update reads Luther’s Works 2017

Playlist “Vatican Fake News – The Reformation is over” by Inquisition Update

Playlist ” The Roman Papacy an Institution of the Devil – in the words of Martin Luther” by Inquisition Update

Almost forbidden books:

“Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.”

[Applause] a brief of the ten commandments half though no other gods but me unto no image bow thy knee take not the name of God in vain nor Sabbath day mm honor thy father and mother too and see that thou no murder do from whoredom keep the pure and clean and still not though thy state be mean see that thou no false witness bare and covered not by neighbor's gear o Lord our souls to the convert and write by laws into our heart hello and welcome to a new video from York juglar 66 hour of the truth I've come here today for the next part and today is the 15th of October 2017 for the next part in the reading of that paper that leads up to the reading of the book from Martin Luther which is called against the Roman papacy an institution by the devil and this little paper is called Martin Luther's view on the Antichrist we have last time finished on page 15 and I'm gonna know continue there on with the next subject called negating Christ's sacrifice and I think this will be the last inaugural reading after that I can start reading the book from Martin Luther to you my English brethren that I already did read completely in German to my German brethren and of course with that the month of October is completely filled with videos only dealing with quote unquote Reformation as I told you that I think the Reformation is really not to reform the Roman Catholic Church but to reform the faith of the people out of the Roman Catholic Church back to real apostolic biblical Christianity and this month of October is very important not only because it is the founders anniversary of Martin Luther nailing his 95 theses to the church door in Wittenberg but it is a very important anyway like every anniversary of the Reformation day is important and please do not celebrate Halloween celebrate Reformation day think of Jesus Christ a lot of ghouls and demons and monsters and the stuff on that day and neither on any other day if I can at least convince you of that not to follow these Roman Catholic feast days so this month of October has been in my channel juggling 66 absolutely a hundred percent dedicated for the Reformation for protests and ISM and for the true Word of God that found the way out of the Roman Catholic Church five hundred years ago at least in Germany and said almost all of Germany in the next years free because Martin Luther translated the Bible on the Wartburg in German and by that also started the High German normal German language as we call it today because they didn't exist before anyway no further introduction I'm just going to start the reading otherwise I'm going to have to make another part I really want to finish this paper today negating Christ's sacrifice is this next little part of the paper called not only did the Roman Antichrist usurp gods prerogatives and persecute his people according to Luther but he in effect negated Christ's sacrifice and mediation quote Antichrist abolish his grace and denies the blessings of Christ our high priest who gave himself as a sacrifice for our sins unquote he said one way he did this was through the doctrine of Merit said Luther the noxious notion of our own righteousness was why we could not at all see Christ as the mediator and Savior but simply supposed that he was a severe John who had to be placated by our works this was to blaspheme Christ through the utmost and to nullify the grace of God to make Christ died to no purpose and this is the desolating sacrilege standing in the holy place as we can read and Matthew chapter 24 verse 15 the doctrine that monks could justify themselves by quote they're hypocritical sanctity even though it is the proper function of Christ alone to justify the sinner unquote head he said quote denied and completely suppress the work of Christ and his divinity unquote the blasphemy on the forehead of the Scarlet whore he interpreted to be the manifold innumerable self chosen works or forms of worship which were presented as sacrifices in order to suppress Christ's sacrifice that's a very important Center the manifold innumerable self chosen works or forms of worship which were presented as sacrifices in order to suppress Christ's sacrifice you know by following the Roman Catholic tradition and Roman Catholic how do you say that the sacraments you make Christ's sacrifice to no avail you deny actually that Jesus Christ was the once and for all sacrifice you deny when you partake of the sacrament of the whole of the quote-unquote Holy Roman Catholic Church you deny that Jesus Christ was the perfect lamb that lamb that takes away the sins of the world the manifold innumerable self-chosen works means all the sacraments and all the works done in the roman catholic church or other forms of worship are s sacrifices in order to suppress Christ's sacrifice well that's normal because the Roman Catholic Church does not leave and darkness does not believe in the Jesus of the Bible therefore the Jesus of the Bible failed and you heard pope francis saying that i think it was even this year 2017 that pope francis said the failure of the cross of jesus christ how can a Christian ever say that Jesus failed on the cross right the Pope is no Christian you got that right now Luther declared quote the chief article of the Christian doctrine is that Christ is our righteousness he who is now attacking this is taking the whole Christ away and is the true Antichrist unquote now Martin Luther really understood who the Antichrist was that the Pope the office of the papacy from the beginning has been is at his time and was for always in the future even from now into all future until Jesus Christ come that comes back the Anti Christ of the Bible the biblical historical and prophetic Antichrist is the papacy denying Christ's work on the cross Luther said the papacy also negated Christ's sacrifice by proclaiming the mass to be quote a sacrifice for the living and the dead now let me just stop here the mass is according to the Roman Catholic Church a sacrifice for the living and the dead now the only time that I can remember when in the Bible it speaks about worshiping dead people God set in one of the first books of Moses don't do it that is necromancy and when one of the disciples wanted to follow Jesus Christ he asked let me first burberry My Father and Jesus Christ answered let dead bury the dead the god of the living Jesus Christ and the Creator God and to create a father of heaven have nothing to do with the debt and they don't approve of anything like praying to the dead Jesus does not and the Father in heaven does not so when we follow him we cannot partake in a quote-unquote sacrifice for the living and the dead that is necromancy the mass in itself is pagan in the Bible there's only the Holy Communion when Jesus said break the spread and do this in remembrance of me when Jesus said take this wine drink this blood and do this in remembrance of me that's biblical the sacrament of the mass is no sacrament it is a sacrilege but even that is a Roman Catholic word word so it's an abomination then it's the true word the biblical word to reject the Roman Catholic Mass and sacrifice for the living and the dead lighting candles you know in the Bible there are never candles lighted but oil lamps big difference huh a sacrifice for the living and the dead is what Luther said that also by this the papacy negated Christ's sacrifice by proclaiming the mass to be a sacrifice for the living and the dead obtaining forgiveness of sins now what does have a celebrating a mass to do with obtaining forgiveness of sins sins can only be forgiven when we pray to Jesus Christ or through Jesus Christ to our Father in heaven only he can't forgive since no man no priest no Cardinal bishop or Pope of Rome it is as though Christ had not done this very thing on the cross as though his sacrifice had no validity and we're of no value well yeah here we come again to the failure of the cross huh it's just the same thing what Pope Francis said this year Jesus failed at the cross it is as though Christ had not done this very thing on the cross as though his sacrifice had no validity and we're of no value that's why the Pope can say Jesus Christ failed at the cross now Luther suggested that these daily repeated sacrifices because that's what the mass is that what that is what this trend substantiation is it is a sacrifice where counterfeiting Christ Luther sent and purporting to do quote that which Christ alone by his sacrifice once for all affected unquote Bravo that is true truly biblical spoken Jesus Christ was the one who alone by his sacrifice once and for all took away the sins of the world that's what he said that's why he said it is done it is finished what is finished the law the sacrificial law is finished no more sacrifice the Roman Catholic Church is all about sacrificing so the Roman Catholic Church is all about denying Jesus Christ and what does the Bible say he who denies Jesus Christ is an antichrist do you need more proof no after this I don't think so and surely not when I'm done with reading the book that is up coming now Luther insisted that Christ was still our only mediator and I insist on that – but the Pope of course says otherwise huh what does the Pope say you need the church or you even need Mary yeah when you want to go to the Father you have to accept the mother and that is the church – now here comes a chord of Martin Luther again Christ and the Scriptures know nothing of the priestly system set up by the papacy Jesus had not abdicated his high priestly office nor had he transferred it to the Pope god preserve us from having any other priest but Christ unquote Martin Luther said god preserve us from having any other priest but Christ ya know manly priest no man priest that we go to for the forgiveness of our sins or that we go to even to confess our sins because then we take away the glory of Jesus Christ god preserve us from having any other priest but Christ biblically and Luther goes into extensively into that in this paper from 1520 on the Christian nobility and also in the Babylonian captivity can read that for yourself it is that way that we are all brethren we are all priests and we have one head and that is Jesus Christ and the Roman Catholic Church says no no no no no you were all lay people and then you have the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church and me on top and I am God on earth well if you want to believe that no problem then you're going to believe that but don't come to me and say that you believe in biblical doctrine because you don't god preserve us from having any other priest but Christ Martin Luther said and I applaud him for that he is so true we have one priest we have one mediator it is stated in the Bible there is no other name and I haven't given unto men by which you must be saved the name Christ Jesus right continue reading another way we nullify Christ's coming in the flesh according to Luther is by calling upon Mary or the other Saints in the whole Bible you can read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation you will not find one verse evaluating Mary the mother of Jesus Christ the biological mother of Jesus Christ but you will find in Jeremiah chapter 44 mentioning of giving homage to the Queen of Heaven and that's the problem the Roman Catholic Church just baptized its pagan traditions with Christianity and by that their Queen of Heaven under the name of Persephone under the name of Ishtar under the name of Semiramis whatever name you want to call them go to Alexander Hislop so to babylons and you will find many many names for that Queen of Heaven that Queen of Heaven became married it is only done or it was only done at the time so that the heathen would accept Christianity as the new religion so they could keep their worshiping idols and gods and goddesses just with another name now all of a sudden their Queen of Heaven was called Mary well the he isn't don't care but the Christians should care when anybody says that you have to venerate Mary the biological mother of Jesus Christ for which there is between Genesis and revelation not one verse written in the Bible the invocation of the Saints is one of the abuses of the Antichrist Martin Luther said now we are dealing a little bit with eschatology Luther believed that the Bible foretold the church's future and suggested that the time of judgment predicted in Daniel 7 verses 8 and 9 was taking place during his lifetime affirming that his own teachings were those of quote the ancient and true church at the time of the Apostles unquote he thought the little horn was being judged as the original and ancient Church shown forth once more like the son emerging from the clouds behind which it had been shining but where it could not be seen he found comfort and the prophecies that the last days would be shortened for the sake of the godly and that the church would be preserved and Antichrist would not encompass everything with error and falsehood he noted that in the second angels message of Revelation 14 the gospel was followed by a voice predicting the babylon the spiritual papacy would be destroyed this would be done according to other passages without human hands with the breath of Christ's mouth slaying him with spiritual preaching before destroying him by his glorious and sudden coming which would free Christendom from every evil at that time those who cling to the papacy against the gospel shall be cast outside the city of Christ into the winepress of God's wrath now did I read anything of a secret rapture I guess not and you know why because the teaching of the rapture and the teaching of a quote-unquote 7-year tribulation only came at the end of the sixteenth century that Luther lived in while Luther was living there was even not from the Roman Catholic Church a dogma of a futurist or preterist Antichrist that were just the answers the Roman Catholic Church gave and with their denial of Jesus Christ fulfilling Daniels 70th week they invented the rapture and that is why Martin Luther does not speak about any rapture because that's a word that he probably didn't even know that wasn't invented at that time there is no rapture as there is no seven-year tribulation well there's no seven-year tribulation I say there's no biblical seven-year tribulation let me say it that way because of course the Antichrist system will take care of that there will be a kind of a seven year tribulation here on earth because they need that to fulfill their phony 70 as we got Daniel but every Christian should be aware of that this tribulation that is happening does not it's not being preceded by a rapture not with in the middle of the tribulation there will be no rapture and after the tribulation there will be no rapture there is no rapture there's only the resurrection at the second coming of Jesus Christ and that's why Luther says Christendom and that this would be done according to other passages without human hands you know this is like the stone that is not hune out with hands from the mountain that crushes the statue of daniel – in the feet without human hands with the breath of Christ's mouth as an another part i think it is in 2nd Thessalonians 2 that we read that Christ with the with the power of his mouth will overcome the Antichrist slaying him with spiritual preaching before destroying him by his glorious and sudden coming as we can read in 2nd Thessalonians 2 which would free Christendom from every evil at that time Martin Luther says those who cling to the papacy against the gospel of Jesus Christ shall be cast outside the city of Christ into the winepress of God's wrath there is no rapture now coming to the end of the paper we are speaking about Luther's final years the intense the intensity of Luther's attacks on the papacy increased during 1545 the final year of his life as Will Durant puts it quote Luther's temper became hot lava as he neared the grave unquote that year 15:45 in his preface to a compilation of his complete works he described the Pope not only as Antichrist but also as the devil's vicar the Pope calls himself vicarious fili ad that stands for The Vicar the replacement of God on earth and the Pope is right he is the Vicar of God on earth but he is the Vicar of the God of this earth as we can read in the New Testament which is the Prince of the air which is Satan and by that Mithen lute Martin Luther nails it when he says he is not only Antichrist but he is also the devil's Vicar you always have to make sure that you understand which God they speak about when the Roman Catholic speaks of God it does not speak of the true creator god but it speaks of their God which is Satan and the Pope is the Vicar of Satan on earth his last and most bitter attack on the Pope was called against the Roman papacy an institution of the devil that book that I am reading which will be the next video I upload probably after this one in the English language written at the request of electro John Frederick it was a response to two letters from Antichrist Pope Paul the third forbidding the Emperor from calling a free German National Council to settle the religious disputes within the Empire now isn't this interesting information the last book that blue they wrote and he published that on the 25th of March 4 15 45 which is the same day the Council of Trent opened was written at the request of elected John Frederick it was a response to two letters from Pope Paul the third forbidding the Emperor from calling a free German National Council to settle the religious disputes within the Empire three times in this publication Luther referred to the Pope as quote the most hellish Father unquote instead of the Most Holy Father as he would like to be called he denounced him as a teacher of Lies blasphemies and idolatries a murderer of kings and insider to all kinds of bloodshed and a brothel keeper above all brother keepers and all vermin and even a true werewolf where such attacks unchristian Luther didn't think so and I surely do not think so earlier yet said it was not sin to refute Satan's reviling against godliness and God himself they must he said be exposed and refuted so the people could be corrected and liberated from the tyranny of Satan similarily Luther said quote we are attacking the Pope as the Antichrist and seducer of the whole world we are incited to anger against him not by personal ambition but by righteous jealousy and fervor of conscience to vindicate and protect the glory of God unquote now isn't this an important sentence and one of my earlier readings I said that I don't hate the Pope by that I mean the man that is behind that office I hate the office of the Pope I had the office of the Antichrist of course as I hate Satan but we are to love the people who hate and persecute us according to Jesus Christ why because the man is just obsessed from a wrong devilish spirit and that is why Martin Luther also says he and I'm going to repeat this one quote again we are attacking the Pope as the Antichrist and seducer of the whole world we are incited to anger against him not by personal ambition not by personal ambition but by righteous jealousy and fervor of conscience to vindicate and protect the glory of God personal ambition not by personal ambition that is don't hate the man but hate his deeds hate the office that here but not the man itself we are to love all men even the lost poles attacks on the false apostles we're not slander he was judging them by his apostolic Authority likewise when Luther called the Pope Antichrist he said he was quote judging by divine authority on the basis of Galatians 1 verse 8 quote but though we or an angel from heaven preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you let him be accursed now isn't there the same judge not so that you will not be judged another place in the Bible is the set why don't you judge because you even go and judging angels so you can judge the reprobates within your own community right it stated in the Bible we have to judge as it says here but though we or an angel from heaven preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you let him be a curse so that means that we have the right to a curse the Pope because he preaches another gospel then the gospel of Jesus Christ not the gospel of the true Bible as long as the Roman Catholic Church does not preach the true Living Creator God of heaven and His only begotten Son Jesus Christ we are to accurse them that's what even stands in the Bible Galatians 1 verse 8 read it for yourself not judging well I am judging by divine authority as Martin Luther calls it and I absolutely agree it can be argued however that although Luther was anti papal he was not anti-catholic no of course he was not anti-catholic I I even dare to say that he stayed a Catholic in his heart for all his life that's why he wanted to reform the Roman Catholic Church he did not see that it really was the synagogue of Satan and was reformable but he was not anti-catholic he was anti Catholic doctrine but he was not anti-catholic because if he or I for example would be anti-catholic I would be anti every Catholic person I am NOT against the Catholic persons I hope that they finally will read Revelation 18 verse four and come out of her as God calls them to come out of there the point is and that's all to the point the author makes here and that is made about Luther that he was not anti-catholic no it can't be anti-catholic you can't be anti all the people were in the Catholic Church but you have to be anti the Roman Catholic hierarchy their superstition their idolatry and all that you have to be against but not against the normal Catholic people it continues to say he opposed the dictatorial monarchical episcopate at the head of the church not the church itself as Jaroslav pelican puts it quote although the Pope was the antichrist seated in the temple of God the church in which she was seated was still the temple of God unquote now we today are 500 years smarter than Martin Luther was and we know that that church is not the temple of God anymore but it was until the time it was hijacked in 321 it was the true church before and then it was hijacked and kidnapped by Rome and in that temple of course in the temple of God the probe sits that's why the Bible says that he will sit in the temple of God and proclaiming himself to be God that's absolutely true so although the Pope was the Anti Christ seated in the temple of God the judge in which he was seated was still the temple of God because it was filled with people who believed righteously in the Creator God of the Bible but they follow not the believe of the Bible as God commands but they follow the tradition and the teaching of men but therefore it was still as they say here the temple of God well today a few years later I do not agree with that anymore that the Roman Catholic Church is the temple of God the temple of God on the body of Christ are the true believers who are the remnant here on the earth now let's have a look at other reformers by the time of Luther's death other voices had joined him in the proclaiming that the Pope was the Antichrist including both his friends and disciple Philip Melancthon and a man for whom he had little respect Ulrich Zwingli who was a swiss reformer under john calvin also other contemporaries of luther who shared his belief about the papal antichrist included john calvin john knox and thomas cranmer among the later reformers who held this view where the le baptist menno simons and various dugan old theologians even King James the first of England got into the act writing an exposition of the book of Revelation that called Rome the seed of the Antichrist and a second Babylon now this is where I have to go a little bit astray today because I just almost couldn't believe it when I read this for the very first time what does it say here let me repeat this that we can get this straight it says King James the first of England who we owe the king and spider 2 got into the act writing an exposition of the book of Revelation that calls Rome the seat of the Antichrist and a second Babylon so therefore I have this excerpt that I have here on the internet right now and I'm going to read to you because this is articles of Christian doctrine which were to have been presented on our part to the council if any had been assembled at a Mantua or elsewhere indicating that we would accept or yield and what we could not it's about the small cult articles from Project Wittenberg Martin Luther in 1537 published in triggered Concordia the symbolical books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church the second part article 4 of the papacy that the Pope is not according to divine law or according to the Word of God the head of all Christendom for this name belongs to one only whose name's Jesus Christ but there's only the bishop and pastor of the church at Rome and of those who voluntarily or through a human creature that is a political magistrate have attached themselves to him to be Christians not under him as a lord but with him as brethren colleagues and comrades as the ancient councils of the age and the age of st. Cyprian show but today none of the bishops dare to address the Pope as brother as was done at the time in the age of Cyprian but they must call him most gracious Lord even though they be kings or Emperor's this arrogance we will not cannot must not take upon our conscience with the good conscience of proof let him however who will do it do so without us at his own risk hence it follows that all things which the Pope from a power so false mischievous blasphemous and Arrogant has done and undertaken have been and still are purely diabolical affairs and transactions with the exception of such things as pertained to the secular government where God often permits much good to be affected for the people even through a tyrant and faithless scoundrel for the ruin of the entire Holy Catholic or Christian Church so far as it is in his power and for the destruction of the first and chief article concerning the redemption made through Jesus Christ for all his Bulls and books are extent in which he roars like a lion as the raeangel in Revelation 12 depict him crying out that no Christian can be saved unless he obeys him and the subject to him in all things that he wishes that he says and that he does all of which amounts to nothing less than saying quote although you believe in Christ and have him alone everything that is necessary to salvation yet it is nothing and all in vain unless you regard have and worship me the Pope as your God and be subject and obedient to me and yet it is manifest that the Holy Church has been without the Pope for at least more than 500 years and that even to the present day the churches of the Greeks and of many other languages neither have been nor are yet under the Pope besides as often remarked it is a human figment which is not commanded and is unnecessary and useless for the Holy Christian or Catholic Church can exist very well without such a head and it would certainly have remained better purer and it's career would have been more prosperous if such a head have not been raised up by the devil and the papacy is also of no use in the church because it exercises no Christian office and therefore it is necessary for the church to continue and to exist without the Pope now let me just explain for a second why am i reading this because I will continue you're reading this in a in a moment the point is and that I just read to you even King James the first of England got into the act writing an exposition of the book of Revelation that called Rome the seat of the Antichrist and the second pablum I would really very much like to get my hands on that paper that is mentioned when in froome's book on page 537 and 540 I could not find that but the article he continues to read many of the foundational Creed's of protest and ISM including the formula of Concord and that is what I am reading from now the formula of Concord as I read here in the beginning this is triggered Concordia the symbolic books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church a writing by Martin Luther in 1537 that I started reading and I just will continue to read that in a second many of the foundational creats of protests in tourism including the formula of Concord what we are just reading here the second Scottish confession the Westminster Confession the Savoy declaration and the Congressional churches and the Baptist confession of 1688 echoed all Luther's belief on this subject and that's why I'm going to continue for a moment reading this not too long article that is taken out of the small cult articles the formula of Concord so I'm going to continue reading so and yeah okay I had to check my my recorder is still running it is okay and supposing that the Pope would yield this point so as to not be supreme by divine right or from God's command but that we must have there must be elected a certain head to whom all the rest adhere as their support as their support in order that the Concord and unity of Christians may be preserved against sects and heretics that such a head were chosen by men and that were placed within the choice and power of min to change or remove this head just as the Council of Constance adopted nearly this course with reverence to the Pope's deposing three and electing a fourth supposing I say that the Pope and cieth Rome will yield and accept this which nevertheless is impossible for that he would have to suffer his entire realm and estate to be overthrown and destroyed with all his rights and books a thing which to speak and few words he cannot do nevertheless even in this way Christianity would not be helped but many more sects would arise then before a very little interesting sentence was this year because I read in the beginning understand this place Christians may be preserved against text and heretics let such a head were chosen by men and then if were placed within the choice and power of men to change or remove this head and the papacy is not that kind of a head the papacy is chosen by a Curia that no normal man elected yeah it's like in the so called democracy where people think that they choose their political leaders but they are chosen by parties not by the people themselves and so Martin Luther says here within the choice and power of men to change or remove this head the papacy just as the Council of Constance did and the Council of Constance in 1514 three popes we're abolished were deposed off and the fourth was elected probably something you didn't know but also we go into that a little bit more when you read Luther's upcoming book for since men would have to be subject to this head not from God's command but from their personal good pleasure it would easily and in a short time be despised and last retain no member neither would it have to be forever confined to Rome or any other place but it might be but it might be wherever and in whatever Church God would grant a man fit for the taking upon him such a great office oh the complicated and confused state of affairs or the perplexity that would result therefore the church can never be better governed and preserved then if it all live under one head Christ and all the bishops equal in office although there be unequal and gifts we diligently joined in unity of doctrine and unity of faith sacraments prayer and works of love etc as Saint Jerome writes that the priests of Alexandria together and then come and govern the churches as did also the Apostles and afterward all bishops throughout all Christendom until the Pope raised his head above all until the Pope raised his head above all until in 606 Emperor focus made the Pope the leader of the Western and the eastern spiritual world and the Pope raised his head as the Bishop of Rome above all other bishops this teaching shows forcefully that the Pope is the very Antichrist whereas exalted himself above and deposed himself against Christ because he will not permit Christians to be saved without his power which nevertheless is nothing and it's neither ordained nor commanded by God this is properly speaking to exalt himself above all that is called God as Paul says in 2nd Thessalonians chapter 2 verse 4 even the Turks are the Tatars great enemies of Christians as they are do not do this but they allow whoever wishes to believe in Christ and take bodily tribute and obedience from Christians now Luther says even the Turks or the Tartars do not do this they do not exalt and themselves above all that is called God therefore my dear listening brethren the Antichrist cannot be somebody from out of Islam but it has to be the papacy the Pope however prohibits this faith saying that to be saved a person must obey Him well the Bible says when you want to be saved you have to obey Jesus Christ and the Pope says no you have to obey Him because he says he is Jesus Christ I guess this we are unwilling to do even though on this account we must die and God's name very important sentence of Martin Luther I'm gonna repeat this first two sentences he have the Pope however prohibits this face saying that to be saved a person must obey Him this we are unwilling to do even though on this account we must die in God's name this all proceeds from the fact that the Pope has wished to be called the supreme head of the Christian Church by divine right accordingly he had to make himself equal and superior to Christ and had to cause himself to be proclaimed the head and then the lord of the church and finally the Lord of the whole world and simply God on earth until he has dared to issue commands even to the angels in heaven and when we distinguished the Pope's teaching from or measure and hold it against Holy Scripture it is found it appears plainly that the Pope is teach that the Pope's teaching where it is best has been taken from the Imperial and heathen law pagon law and treats of political matters and decisions all right as the decree don't show furthermore it teaches of ceremonies concerning churches garments food persons and similar puerile theatrical and comical things without measure but in all these things nothing at all of Christ nothing at all of faith and the commandments of God lastly it is nothing else than the devil himself because above and against God he urges and disseminates his papal falsehoods concerning masses purgatory the monastic life one's own works and fictitious divine worship for this is the very papacy upon each of which the papacy is altogether founded and is standing and condemns murders and tortures all Christians who do not exalt and honor these abominations of the Pope above all things therefore just as little as we can worth just as little as we can worship the devil himself as Lord and God we can endure his apostle the Pope or Antichrist in this rule as head of Lord for to lie and to kill and to destroy Bunny and soul eternally that is where in his papal government really consists as I have very clearly shown in many books and these four articles they will have enough to condemn in the council for they cannot and will not concede us even the least point in one of these articles of this we should be certain and animate ourselves with the form before want and made firm in the hope that Christ our Lord has attacked his adversary and he will press the attack home pursue and destroy him both by his spirit and coming amen for in the council we will stand not be for the emperor or the political magistrate as at Augsburg where the Emperor published a most gracious edict and caused matters to be heard kindly and dispassionately but we will appear before the Pope and devil himself who intends to listen to nothing but merely when the case has been publicly announced to condemned to murder and to force us to idolatry therefore we are not here to kiss his feet or to say thou art my gracious Lord but as the angel and Zechariah three to set to Satan the Lord rebuke thee I'll sing and this is the end of the small current article that I wanted to read from you from Martin Luther it is not maybe that you expected the writing of King James I don't have that but I would very much like to get my hands on that so if anybody can do some research on that and find that book or that writing of King James the first of England as its stated here in this paper writing an exposition of the book of Revelation that called Rome the seed of Antichrist and the second Babylon I would really very much like to get that and you can find that probably in the book of Froome it says it says your Froome two five three seven five 4540 so probably the pages of 537-549 oh what book of room that wasn't I don't have that book but you know if anybody has said I would be glad to receive it anywhere anytime and of course I would very much like to read it because it's just another point that the King James Bible is the only true Bible and King James was not a Catholic and even if he was he was not but even if he was he did not translate the Bible but a committee of 45 righteous men now we come to the conclusion Luther's conflict with church authorities over the financial exploitation of his parishioners you know the indulgences through indulgences led to papal attempts to silence the independent-minded monk he first began to suspect that the papacy was the Antichrist when its representatives resorted to power place rather than appealing to scripture supported the execution of dissidents and long before it became official Dogma claimed papal infallibility long before it became official dogma you know official dogma of papal infallibility was claimed at Vatican Council 1 in 1870 by Pope Pius the 9th but long before that already the Pope's of the Roman Catholic Church and the person of the Pope claimed infallibility he became sure of his position when the Pope himself threatened Luther with excommunication pressured rulers to silence him and ordered the extermination of him and his followers but Luther's Antichrist theology was the result of biblical analysis as well as personal experience the key theological reason for Luther's position was his belief that the Pope was in many ways usurping God's place and negating Christ's sacrifice a very important sentence that was Luther's Antichrist theology was the result of biblical analysis as well as personal experience I find this a very very important tense you know because it was a success here the result of biblical analysis that the papacy is the Antichrist is proven by Scripture by the Word of God itself Daniel Paul and John where the testimonies of it Daniel chapter 2 and especially chapter 7 Paul and second Thessalonians 2 and John the Revelator in Revelation 13 and 17 and 18 all pointing biblically in the biblical analysis to the papacy being the Antichrist it is not jerk who says that Pope is the Antichrist is not just Luther who says the Pope is the Antichrist or any other of the other reformers that are mentioned here like John Calvin John Knox Thomas Cranmer or returing Lee Philip Melancthon and and regrettin Guiness and James Aitken Wylie and Charles Spurgeon and so many other wrote reformer or protest and writers that all accountant the office of them Antichrist to the papacy it is because it is based on biblical analysis and therefore it is absolutely necessary to be in possession of the only right true Bible that also gives you this explanation when you read these forged Bibles these corrupt Bibles like the NIV and New Living Translation and na s v and r SB and ESV and NLT and I don't know all the names but count them all more than a few hundred Bibles probably you will not have the same understanding because those Bibles are written to hide the fact that the papacy s the Antichrist at the first of these Bibles who who height and width that fact was the Scofield reference Bible anyway Luther's Antichrist theology was the result of biblical analysis this is what we really have to take home from this reading here clearly it says Luther's position on the Antichrist is no longer politically it was not politically correct a new this time it is not politically correct in our time it will not be cool politically correct in any time because it is not politically correct to speak the truth it is out of sync with a group thing of the 21st century as Hika Oberman says quote Luther's way of speaking about the Antichrist has become alien to us haha that's a nice claudia Luther's way of speaking about the Antichrist has become Aryan to us do you know what Luther said you are not only responsible for what you say but you're also responsible for what you do not say so you are responsible for when you are a Bible believing Christian and you know from the Bible that the papacy s the Antichrist and you do not speak out you are responsible for that and you will be held responsible for that before the judge of our Lord Jesus Christ politically correct my behind there is no political correctness because political correctness is serving this world we are not to serve this world we are to serve our Lord Jesus Christ and not the Antichrist Luther's way of speaking about the Antichrist has become alien to us it should come our second nature become our second nature Luther said peace if possible the truth at all cost I want peace with Roman Catholics I want peace with the Pope but I want the truth at all cost and I don't want any peace with the Antichrist or any unity with the Antichrist or ecumenical meaning or any church for that matter if it compromises on the truth on the true will of God on the 1611 King James Bible then not for me then I say with Luther's words peace if possible but the truth at all costs and all costs in clewd my life here on earth however the article continues with so great a cloud of witnesses as we can read in Hebrews 12 verse one stretching back so many centuries he cou who courageously asserted that the papacy was the Antichrist the question for us should not be is this position embarrassing or is it politically correct or socially acceptable rather it should be is it biblically correct this view was not politically correct a new Thursday it was very incorrect politically and in Luther's day unlike ours this opinion could have been literally fatal for the person holding it as it was for John Huss and Thomas Cranmer and with this I end the reading of this paper that is called Martin Luther's view or Martin Luther's views on the Antichrist that was the introduction to me reading the book that we can find an Luther's works vol 41 church and ministry ruthless book his legacy I'd like to call it the last book he ever wrote against the Roman papacy an institution of the devil you will find these readings all leading up to that reading and the book reading itself in the playlist Luther 2017 a playlist that I started I think even last year when I was analyzing a paper on Luther and did that reading had no idea that this playlist will ever grow out that much but in that playlist you will find all the videos of the book reading against the Roman papacy an institution of the devil stay tuned thanks for watching thanks for listening thanks for commenting and until next time drop the 66 from other tools signing off says god bless you and who has his heart there is no God they are corrupt they have done abominable works there is none that you the hood said it is hard there is no God God tells us what to do some obey some resist the fool says it is hard that God does not exist if he's how the foolish justify evil they have done it takes a fool to say there is no God some 14 verse 1 The Fool has said in his heart there is no God they are corrupt they have done abominable works there's no that do is go the setting is hard there Oh there is no that do is good the food said in his heart here Oh God

2 thoughts on “Luther’s Antichrist Theology was the Result of biblical Analysis!

  1. One of my great frustrations that people accept the anti-Christ will come from Islam, the creates a huge contradiction in the bible. Time Magazine and so many other Jesuit outlets have done a superb job hammering home a single anti-Christ not many per the bible.

  2. Someone recommended your channel to me today and I don't know where to start watching. Coincidentally, I'm learning German, so maybe I'll be able to watch all of your videos some day. Thank you for the information and God bless.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *